Three
I'M BEGGING YOU TO READ THIS ONE
Dear fans, and those who endure me:
I sincerely urge you to read this letter. It may be the one letter I write this year truly worthy of your attention. So much so that I ask that you send a reply. No matter if you are a seminary grad., or a babe in christ, a pastor or a grunt (foot soldier) like me, I truly believe the information and the source of it to be essential truth for the culture war. I can't state the case strongly enough. If your goals in the Lord are not being achieved as you desire for his pleasure, KNOW THIS: (as I have discovered this week), the church in N. America with all it's resources has lost ground to the Athiest and the pagan because of her ignorance. Please read this and let me know what you think. I believe it will start us on the road to accomplishments for Jesus we never dreamed, or are dreaming, possible.
Yours BEGGING,
Dave P.S. my words are in these dark blue letters.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The excerpt below is from Answers in Genesis. If you will go there and study even a little bit, the rewards will amaze you. We simply have no concept of how foolish we appear to the unbelievers when we cannot even tell them the Lord's answers for Darwin's theories. The folks at Answers in Genesis may have the most powerful apologetic ministry going today. They believe that the Bible is 100% correct, authoritative and Inspired by God Almighty. They also say that the Devil has quite cunningly and effectively undermined the once widely held respect for and FAITH in this TRUE BOOK by casting aspersions through Darwin's "theories". I learned something else I didn't know: Clarence Darrow, who defended Scopes at the infamous "Monkey Trial" was an ACLU lawyer !!!! There are sure enough plenty of dupes wearing the ACLU label in courts today, yet these dupes of the devil are running roughshod over the dupes of the church who haven't the slightest idea (as I had not till this past week ) of how to even teach the Book to their children. It gets me a bit steamed up to challenge us all to do a little homework for the Lord's sake and our own , that we might not appear fools trying to defend our FAITH !!! William Jennings Bryant, who prosecuted Scopes in the Monkey Trial, could not stop the admission of evolutionary teaching into that Tennesee public school. Here is one reason why:
from : http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i2/bigpicture.asp
The big picture
Being wrong about the six days of creation does not automatically mean someone is not a Christian. But if you think that makes it unimportant, stand back and look at the big picture....
by Ken Ham
The world’s press was watching and listening in 1925 when, at the famous Scopes Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, William Jennings Bryan (seen as the man representing Christianity) was cross-examined about his faith.
Part of the dialogue went as follows:
Clarence Darrow (the ACLU lawyer) [D]: ‘Mr Bryan, could you tell me how old the Earth is?’
Bryan [B]: ‘No, sir, I couldn’t.’
[D]: ‘Could you come anywhere near it?’
[B]: ‘I wouldn’t attempt to. I could possibly come as near as the scientists do, but I had rather be more accurate before I give a guess.’ …
[D]: ‘Does the statement, “The morning and the evening were the first day,” and “The morning and the evening were the second day,” mean anything to you?’
[B]: ‘I do not think it necessarily means a twenty-four-hour day.’
[D]: ‘You do not?’
[B]: ‘No.’ …
[D]: ‘Then, when the Bible said, for instance, "and God called the firmament heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day," that does not necessarily mean twenty-four-hours?’
[B]: ‘I do not think it necessarily does.’ … ‘I think it would be just as easy for the kind of God we believe in to make the Earth in six days as in six years or in six million years or in 600 million years. I do not think it important whether we believe one or the other.’
[D]: ‘And they had the evening and the morning before that time for three days or three periods. All right, that settles it. Now, if you call those periods, they may have been a very long time.’
[B]: ‘They might have been.’
[D]: ‘The creation might have been going on for a very long time?’
[B]: ‘It might have continued for millions of years.’
Right there, I believe, Darrow knew he had ‘won’ the trial in the public mind! As a humanist, Darrow knew that the language of Genesis 1 was clear, and taught that God created in six literal days. But he knew that if he could show the world that Christians really didn’t believe the Bible like they purported to, he could persuade many that Christianity was a bankrupt belief—which is what he really set out to do in this trial anyway. copyright © Answers in Genesis http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i2/bigpicture.asp
***************************************************************
William Jennings Bryan was a brilliant lawyer but he didn't know squat about God's Book !!! We all should take a lesson, yes? The reason we have public schools tearing our children down instead of raising them up is OUR OWN IGNORANCE HAS LEFT THEM DEFENSELESS AGAINST THOSE WHO BELIEVE AND TEACH THEM THEY HAVE APES FOR GREAT GRANDPARENTS !!!!!!!! Yet I wonder just what God meant by these verses?:
2 Thessalonians 2: 6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Isaiah 66: 4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.
Could the delusion be evolution? I think it could be. What do you think?
What I learned from Answers in Genesis this week:
If the fossils are really millions of years old, then they died millions of years ago. By simple math we KNOW the year that God created Adam to be in the range of 6000 years ago. The Jewish calendar is today in the year 5766. http://www.uscj.org/metny/huntinhh/heb5cal.html One has to deny the Bibles dates to say that man was created or was evolved by God millions of years ago. If man was that old, the fossils would place the beginnings of the death of men and animals before the year of Adams appearance. We KNOW that Adam and Eve were sinless and that by their sin, death (the real death) entered into the earth. Before Adam's sin : no death; after Adam's sin : death. If this is true, and the Bible is true, yes?, then no death could have preceded Adam's sin. Therefore all the dead fossils have to have died AFTER Adam sinned. This thinking about what IS TRUE will either make or break the entire Bible in the minds of men and women. For if the fossilized remains are older than Adam's sin, then God's Words in Genesis to Adam are just lies. That's not the way I see it and God doen't teach it that way either. It is only one step further to the conclusion that God's word- Genesis 2:24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh -is also a lie, and that men can marry men and women women. I have had to reconsider much in my life after I got saved. And the above thinking is all new to me. I believed in the six day creation, but I didn't realize how crucial it is to believe it to be able to defend the rest of God's Book. If there is one lie in the Holy Bible, how can anyone be expected to place any confidence in the rest of it, or in it's being from God mouth? And do not persons use the slightest "appearance" of contradiction in the Bible as an excuse to throw the entire text on the ash heap?
It is encumbent upon the elect and the saved to rescue the Book and it's Holy repute from the ash heap. The resources at http://www.answersingenesis.org/ are so good that your church, sunday school, and even your children simply must see them and teach/be taught them.
Dear fans, and those who endure me:
I sincerely urge you to read this letter. It may be the one letter I write this year truly worthy of your attention. So much so that I ask that you send a reply. No matter if you are a seminary grad., or a babe in christ, a pastor or a grunt (foot soldier) like me, I truly believe the information and the source of it to be essential truth for the culture war. I can't state the case strongly enough. If your goals in the Lord are not being achieved as you desire for his pleasure, KNOW THIS: (as I have discovered this week), the church in N. America with all it's resources has lost ground to the Athiest and the pagan because of her ignorance. Please read this and let me know what you think. I believe it will start us on the road to accomplishments for Jesus we never dreamed, or are dreaming, possible.
Yours BEGGING,
Dave P.S. my words are in these dark blue letters.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The excerpt below is from Answers in Genesis. If you will go there and study even a little bit, the rewards will amaze you. We simply have no concept of how foolish we appear to the unbelievers when we cannot even tell them the Lord's answers for Darwin's theories. The folks at Answers in Genesis may have the most powerful apologetic ministry going today. They believe that the Bible is 100% correct, authoritative and Inspired by God Almighty. They also say that the Devil has quite cunningly and effectively undermined the once widely held respect for and FAITH in this TRUE BOOK by casting aspersions through Darwin's "theories". I learned something else I didn't know: Clarence Darrow, who defended Scopes at the infamous "Monkey Trial" was an ACLU lawyer !!!! There are sure enough plenty of dupes wearing the ACLU label in courts today, yet these dupes of the devil are running roughshod over the dupes of the church who haven't the slightest idea (as I had not till this past week ) of how to even teach the Book to their children. It gets me a bit steamed up to challenge us all to do a little homework for the Lord's sake and our own , that we might not appear fools trying to defend our FAITH !!! William Jennings Bryant, who prosecuted Scopes in the Monkey Trial, could not stop the admission of evolutionary teaching into that Tennesee public school. Here is one reason why:
from : http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i2/bigpicture.asp
The big picture
Being wrong about the six days of creation does not automatically mean someone is not a Christian. But if you think that makes it unimportant, stand back and look at the big picture....
by Ken Ham
The world’s press was watching and listening in 1925 when, at the famous Scopes Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, William Jennings Bryan (seen as the man representing Christianity) was cross-examined about his faith.
Part of the dialogue went as follows:
Clarence Darrow (the ACLU lawyer) [D]: ‘Mr Bryan, could you tell me how old the Earth is?’
Bryan [B]: ‘No, sir, I couldn’t.’
[D]: ‘Could you come anywhere near it?’
[B]: ‘I wouldn’t attempt to. I could possibly come as near as the scientists do, but I had rather be more accurate before I give a guess.’ …
[D]: ‘Does the statement, “The morning and the evening were the first day,” and “The morning and the evening were the second day,” mean anything to you?’
[B]: ‘I do not think it necessarily means a twenty-four-hour day.’
[D]: ‘You do not?’
[B]: ‘No.’ …
[D]: ‘Then, when the Bible said, for instance, "and God called the firmament heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day," that does not necessarily mean twenty-four-hours?’
[B]: ‘I do not think it necessarily does.’ … ‘I think it would be just as easy for the kind of God we believe in to make the Earth in six days as in six years or in six million years or in 600 million years. I do not think it important whether we believe one or the other.’
[D]: ‘And they had the evening and the morning before that time for three days or three periods. All right, that settles it. Now, if you call those periods, they may have been a very long time.’
[B]: ‘They might have been.’
[D]: ‘The creation might have been going on for a very long time?’
[B]: ‘It might have continued for millions of years.’
Right there, I believe, Darrow knew he had ‘won’ the trial in the public mind! As a humanist, Darrow knew that the language of Genesis 1 was clear, and taught that God created in six literal days. But he knew that if he could show the world that Christians really didn’t believe the Bible like they purported to, he could persuade many that Christianity was a bankrupt belief—which is what he really set out to do in this trial anyway. copyright © Answers in Genesis http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i2/bigpicture.asp
***************************************************************
William Jennings Bryan was a brilliant lawyer but he didn't know squat about God's Book !!! We all should take a lesson, yes? The reason we have public schools tearing our children down instead of raising them up is OUR OWN IGNORANCE HAS LEFT THEM DEFENSELESS AGAINST THOSE WHO BELIEVE AND TEACH THEM THEY HAVE APES FOR GREAT GRANDPARENTS !!!!!!!! Yet I wonder just what God meant by these verses?:
2 Thessalonians 2: 6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Isaiah 66: 4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.
Could the delusion be evolution? I think it could be. What do you think?
What I learned from Answers in Genesis this week:
If the fossils are really millions of years old, then they died millions of years ago. By simple math we KNOW the year that God created Adam to be in the range of 6000 years ago. The Jewish calendar is today in the year 5766. http://www.uscj.org/metny/huntinhh/heb5cal.html One has to deny the Bibles dates to say that man was created or was evolved by God millions of years ago. If man was that old, the fossils would place the beginnings of the death of men and animals before the year of Adams appearance. We KNOW that Adam and Eve were sinless and that by their sin, death (the real death) entered into the earth. Before Adam's sin : no death; after Adam's sin : death. If this is true, and the Bible is true, yes?, then no death could have preceded Adam's sin. Therefore all the dead fossils have to have died AFTER Adam sinned. This thinking about what IS TRUE will either make or break the entire Bible in the minds of men and women. For if the fossilized remains are older than Adam's sin, then God's Words in Genesis to Adam are just lies. That's not the way I see it and God doen't teach it that way either. It is only one step further to the conclusion that God's word- Genesis 2:24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh -is also a lie, and that men can marry men and women women. I have had to reconsider much in my life after I got saved. And the above thinking is all new to me. I believed in the six day creation, but I didn't realize how crucial it is to believe it to be able to defend the rest of God's Book. If there is one lie in the Holy Bible, how can anyone be expected to place any confidence in the rest of it, or in it's being from God mouth? And do not persons use the slightest "appearance" of contradiction in the Bible as an excuse to throw the entire text on the ash heap?
It is encumbent upon the elect and the saved to rescue the Book and it's Holy repute from the ash heap. The resources at http://www.answersingenesis.org/ are so good that your church, sunday school, and even your children simply must see them and teach/be taught them.
posted by David B Severy | 11:05 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home